Warning: Scammers may contact you by phone or email and claim to be from De Nederlandsche Bank. Do not respond! We will never contact you by phone or email. And we will never ask you to provide personal details or transfer money. Read more

When Did Firms Become More Different? Time-Varying Firm-Specific Volatility in Japan

Working paper 351
Working Papers

Published: 11 October 2012

By: Emmanuel De Veirman Andrew Levin

We document how firm-specific volatility in sales, earnings and employment growth evolved year by year in Japan. Our volatility measure also indicates the evolution of firm turnover. We find that patterns in firm-specific volatility have changed when macroeconomic circumstances have. Firm turnover declined during the economic stagnation of 1991-1997. The deep downturn of fiscal years 1998-2002 coincided with a substantial increase in turnover in market, profit and employment shares. Firm volatility tended to decline during the recovery after 2002. We assess whether the rise in firm turnover and deep downturn in 1998-2002 indicate that after a period of stagnation, weak firms were finally allowed to shrink or fail. Our evidence suggests that the widening in the firm growth distribution at that time did not reflect weak firms shrinking relative to healthy firms, indicating that the two recessions in 1998-2002 were not 'cleansing'.

Keywords: Firm volatility, firm health, zombie lending, cleansing recessions
JEL codes C33, D22, E32, E44

Working paper no. 351

351 - When Did Firms Become More Different? Time-Varying Firm-Specific Volatility in Japan

666 Bytes PDF
Download 351 - When Did Firms Become More Different? Time-Varying Firm-Specific Volatility in Japan

Discover related articles