On 3 November 2021, on Finance Day at the COP26, we will publish a statement in which we pledge, within our mandate, to contribute to a decisive policy commitment to implement the Paris Agreement and to mitigate the impact of climate change.Read more
Climate change is having a profound impact on people, businesses and the economy. We expect financial institutions to identify and manage their climate-related risks.
Direct and indirect damage
The violent floods this summer in Limburg, the forest fires in southern Europe, the extreme heat in Canada and the melting ice caps: they are all linked to global warming. These extreme weather events have a profound impact on the people, businesses and infrastructure in the affected areas. They may also cause indirect damage, for example through production or disruptions in distribution. The damage caused by climate change is huge in all respects, including financially. For example, insurers face large claims. But consumers and businesses cannot insure everything, so potential losses are wide-ranging.
Climate change is high on our agenda
The direct and indirect impact of climate change affects both the financial system and the economy as a whole, which is why it also affects our work. In our supervision, we pay close attention to the risks of climate change and the energy transition that should limit global warming. We ask financial institutions to take action in this respect. As a central bank, we incorporate climate change into our monetary policy and our recommendations to the government. In addition, we want to encourage the greening of the financial system. We do so as a member of the Sustainable Finance Platform and the international Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). We are also making our own investments and business operations more sustainable.
Risks of climate change
Climate change poses two types of risk to financial institutions. These are physical risks and transition risks.
- Physical risks are the risks of damage caused by extreme weather conditions such as prolonged droughts, floods and storms. They also include risks of damage caused by more gradual climate and environmental changes, such as air and water pollution and soil contamination, water shortages, biodiversity loss and deforestation, rising temperatures, rising sea levels, land-use change, destruction of biotopes and resource scarcity.
- Transition risks are the risks of direct and indirect loss and damage during the transition to a low-carbon and environmentally friendly economy to limit global warming. These risks could result from a relatively abrupt introduction of climate-related and environmental policies, from technological progress and from changes in market sentiment and market preferences.
Effects of climate change on banks
European banks are hit hard if we do not act against climate change, according to a climate stress test conducted by the European Central Bank (ECB). This is because the cost of natural disasters and extreme weather conditions will increase. As a result, some businesses could to be unable to repay their loans to banks. In addition, the energy transition could cause banks to make losses on loans they have outstanding to carbon-intensive businesses. The ECB's stress test shows that a bank's corporate loan portfolio is 8% more likely to default in 2050 under a greenhouse gas scenario than under the scenario that involves an orderly energy transition. Portfolios most vulnerable to climate risks are even 30% more likely to default by 2050. Read more about the ECB's climate stress test.
Climate change and our supervision
Financial institutions must ensure they remain safe and sound. This is at the core of our supervision. We pay close attention to climate risks because they can threaten the financial health of an institution. We expect financial institutions to identify and manage these risks.
Tackling climate risks in the financial sector
We expect financial institutions to identify and manage their climate-related risks as part of all of their operations, from business strategy to risk management frameworks. We expect banks to factor climate risks into the lending process and monitor these risks in their portfolios. We also expect institutions to monitor the impact of climate and environmental factors on current market risk positions and future investment. Read more about our expectations of banks' climate risk management.
Assessing board members on climate knowledge
We expect senior management of financial institutions to have knowledge of the risks inherent in climate change and the transition to a climate-neutral economy. They need such knowledge to define the business strategy, objectives and risk management framework, and to supervise these. We assess all prospective management and supervisory board members of financial institutions for fitness and propriety. Climate-related and environmental risks also feature in our assessment interviews. We ask proposed board members about their knowledge and experience with these risks and the legislation that applies. Read more about our fit and proper assessments here.
The financial sector and sustainable investment
Businesses in the financial sector can contribute to the energy transition by investing sustainably. Financial institutions have sizeable investment portfolios, sometimes worth billions of euros. If they invest more, for example, in renewable energy and less in carbon-intensive sectors, they can contribute to achieving a climate-neutral economy. For example, Dutch insurers invest less in fossil fuels. In 2019, they invested 17% of their assets under management in the three most polluting sectors, down from 24% in 2021. Recently ABP, which is the largest Dutch pension fund, decided it would no longer invest in fossil energy. Read more about our research and recommendations on financing the energy transition.
We are committed to ensuring a safe financial sector. This is why we supervise financial institutions. We closely follow all developments that may affect financial institutions and monitor risks to prevent things from going wrong. Read more about our supervision.
From an economic perspective, pricing is the most efficient means of reducing carbon emissions. As climate change is a worldwide problem, carbon pricing works best with a global price for carbon emissions. However, complete global pricing seems infeasible.Read more