This paper analyses the efficiency of employment subsidies versus job retention schemes in a random search-and-matching model with human capital depreciation during unemployment and endogenous job destruction. Unlike under exogenous destruction, employment subsidies aimed at correcting inefficient hiring now distort the job-destruction margin, resulting in excess job destruction and turnover. Accordingly, employment subsidies no longer suffice to correct the inefficiency of the decentralised allocation: welfare can be further improved by optimally combining employment subsidies and job-retention schemes.
Keywords: Skill loss; Endogenous job-destruction; Job retention; Optimal policy
JEL codes E24; J63; J64
Working paper no. 855
855 - Optimal Job Retention
Research highlights:
- We analyse the efficiency of employment subsidies vs. job retention schemes in search-and-matching model with human capital depreciation (HCD) during unemployment and endogenous job destruction.
- Unlike under exogenous job destruction, employment subsidies no longer suffice to correct for the composition externality under HCD.
- Employment subsidies raise hiring but also increase turnover by raising the value of unemployment.
- Job retention schemes reduce separations and complement employment subsidies.
- Combining both policies improves welfare beyond using each subsidy separately.
Discover related articles
DNB uses cookies
We use cookies to optimise the user-friendliness of our website.
Read more about the cookies we use and the data they collect in our cookie notice.