Today, speaking at the ASEAN+3 Economic Cooperation and Financial Stability Forum (online) in his capacity as FSB chair, Klaas Knot said that vulnerabilities in the global financial system remain elevated.Read more
Resolution planning for banks
De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) determines in advance how it will intervene in a bank that gets into difficulty. The bank must remove any obstacles to such intervention. This process is known as resolution planning. Resolution planning ensures that both DNB and the banks are better prepared for a possible crisis, thereby reducing the impact of a bank's failure.
Due care – the resolution plan
We draw up a resolution plan for each bank. It describes how we may intervene if a bank is in difficulty. It includes:
- a resolution strategy
- a description of how operational and financial continuity is guaranteed
- the amount of loss-absorbing capacity a bank must hold
- any obstacles to implementation of the resolution strategy.
A resolution strategy includes the following points:
- Will a bank be allowed to go bankrupt or will DNB take it into resolution? We determine this by means of a “public interest test,” in which we assess the impact of a bankruptcy on the financial system, the economy as a whole and society. For example, a bank may have so many payment or savings accounts that we consider this function to be critical. The impact on other banks, and hence financial stability in the Netherlands, may also be too great. In that case the bank qualifies for resolution. We update the public interest test each year and also perform it when a bank is failing or likely to fail.
- If a bank qualifies for resolution, we describe the preferred resolution tool. Generally, the bail-in tool is appropriate for the largest banks, while a sale is the most likely option for smaller banks.
A bank’s operational and financial continuity is crucial for us to be able to implement the resolution strategy. The resolution plan states, for example, which ICT systems must continue to operate. Sufficient liquidity must also be guaranteed during and after resolution.
Safeguarding loss absorbing capacity
If a bank fails and goes into resolution, it must have sufficient “loss absorbing capacity”. This is necessary to absorb losses and recapitalise the bank with the aid of the bail-in tool. Since 2017, European resolution authorities have been able to impose on banks minimum required own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL). This safeguards a bank's loss-absorbing capacity. As of 1 January 2019, globally systemically important banks (G-SIBs) must comply with the total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC) standard of the Financial Stability Board (FSB), an international consultative body for the worldwide financial system.
Obstacles to resolution
Finally, we will assess whether the resolution plan is feasible in practice and whether there are obstacles to its implementation at the bank, such as an overly complex structure, non-marketable assets or an inability to supply certain information s promptly. If we identify an obstacle, the bank must eliminate it to ensure the feasibility of the resolution strategy.
DNB contacts a bank before we draw up its resolution plan to request the information we need. Once we have finished the plan, we share the overall conclusions with the bank.
Discover related articles
Dutch institutional investors such as pension funds, investment funds and insurers kept their investments in risky bonds roughly the same over the past 12 months. This is a break from previous years: since 2019, large investors had expanded their exposure to what are termed high-yield bonds.Read more
Dutch banks are financially resilient, thanks in part to increased interest rates. This gives them the room to step up their ambitions in terms of digitalisation, sustainability and the fight against money laundering.Read more
In his introductory remarks at the Fifth Macroprudential Policy and Research Conference at the ECB in Frankfurt Klaas Knot discussed some of the challenges in using macro-prudential tools.Read more