Information session about fit and proper assessments DNB
On Tuesday 28th May from 3:00-4:45 PM CET DNB will organize an online information session about fit and proper assessments.
Read more Information session about fit and proper assessments DNB
Application of the UFR in valuing profit-sharing schemes and options
Q&A
Question:
- In valuing options and guarantees for the purpose of the adequacy test, may insurers let the forward rates separately converge to the Ultimate Forward Rate (UFR) in every interest rate scenario?
- In valuing options and guarantees for the purpose of the adequacy test, may insurers let the forward rates separately converge to the Ultimate Forward Rate (UFR) in every interest rate scenario?
Answer:
1 - No, they may not. The UFR relates solely to the current interest rate curve used to discount insurance liabilities in the adequacy test. As the UFR and its calibration bear no relationship to expectations about the level and volatility of future yield curves, the UFR does not affect the interest rate volatilities applied in the adequacy test.
2 - No, they may not. Doing so is incompatible not only with a consistent application of the yield curve in the method to value options and guarantees but also with the theorem of arbitrage-free pricing. The current yield curve by which cash flows accrue interest must be equal to the yield curve by which they are discounted.
In valuing options (e.g. the options of policyholders which are implicit in the insurance) and guarantees for the purpose of the adequacy test, insurers apply a range of methods including economic scenario generators and closed form formulas. The introduction of the UFR in the current interest rate curve of the adequacy test is not intended to make immediate changes to the methods used to value options and guarantees, including the adjustment of interest rate scenarios such that the forward rates separately converge to the UFR in every scenario. Any changes to the valuation method for options and guarantees must be applied consistently and must be reconcilable as much as possible with the theorem of arbitrage-free pricing.
Naturally, insurers must explain how they value options and guarantees in the adequacy test.
Insurers may use the Good Practice – Adequacy Test for Life Insurers when valuing options and guarantees and drafting the related explanatory notes.
Interesting articles
-
-
The professional oath in daily practice
How does one bring the professional oath to life in daily practice? Representatives from the financial sector and the supervisory authorities tackled this question at the DNB seminar on the professional oath in late 2022.
Read more The professional oath in daily practice -
Dutch insurers continue to invest less in bonds
Insurers in the Netherlands continued to sell direct investments in bonds in 2023, new figures from DNB show. For the fourth year in a row, insurers sold more bonds than they bought.
Read more Dutch insurers continue to invest less in bonds -
DNB and AFM: recommendations for a strong European Capital Markets Union
In view of our continued support for a deeper and more integrated European Capital Markets Union (CMU), De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) and the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) present next steps to shape the right policies and create a competitive European capital market.
Read more DNB and AFM: recommendations for a strong European Capital Markets Union
