Inequality along the European green transition
Gepubliceerd: 11 maart 2025
Door: Guido Ascari Andrea Colciago Timo Haber Stefan Wöhrmüller
The EU aims for 42.5% green energy consumption by 2030. What are the effects of the European green transition on inequality? We answer this question using a heterogeneous-agent model with non-homothetic preferences for energy and non-energy goods, calibrated to European data. We study the impact of an increase in carbon taxes designed to meet the EU target under different revenue-recycling strategies. Redistributing tax revenues via uniform transfers reduces consumption inequality, shifts the welfare burden to high-income households, but leads to significant output losses. Subsidizing green energy producers boosts energy production, reduces output losses, and requires a smaller carbon tax to meet the EU target. However, it increases consumption and income inequality, with the highest welfare costs borne by low-income and asset-poor households. Our findings highlight key trade-offs between equity and efficiency in green transition policies.
Keywords: Green Transition; Inequality; Carbon Pricing
JEL codes Q43; Q52; E6
Working paper no. 830
830 - Inequality along the European green transition
Research highlights:
- We analyze the overall and distributional impacts of the EU's green transition.
- Specifically, we examine the effects of different uses of carbon tax revenues, including (i) Government spending, (ii) Uniform transfers to households, and (iii) Subsidies for clean energy production
- We develop a general equilibrium model that includes both green and non-green energy producers. The model accounts for the fact that agents with lower income and wealth devote a larger proportion of their total expenditure on energy consumption compared to wealthier individuals.
- Government spending increases consumption inequality, while lump-sum transfers reduce it by redistributing income. Green subsidies have mild negative redistributive effects.
- Policy recommendations depend on the goals of the policymaker, as our findings reveal important trade-offs between equity and efficiency. Lump-sum transfers reduce inequality, while green subsidies support economic stability and lower overall costs.
Ontdek gerelateerde artikelen
DNB maakt gebruik van cookies
Om de gebruiksvriendelijkheid van onze website te optimaliseren, maken wij gebruik van cookies.
Lees meer over de cookies die wij gebruiken en de gegevens die we daarmee verzamelen in onze cookie-policy.