This is not to disregard the large uncertainty surrounding the outlook for growth, but to underline the resilience of demand we have seen so far. The economy has held up well, and some of the factors behind the positive GDP surprise in Q2 might well spill over to Q3 (think about tourism). Looking further ahead, recent indicators (PMIs) do point at declining activity and business- and household confidence in the euro area. Yet, even if this slowdown were to materialize, this in itself is unlikely to bring inflation back to our objective over the medium term.
Taken together, all this evidence is fueling my concerns that inflation will remain high for quite some time to come. In that context I find it striking that markets have shifted their expected path of euro area inflation further out in time and now expect headline inflation to peak only in 2023Q1.
On top of that, I see several upside risks to inflation. First, high energy and food price inflation may turn out more persistent than expected, as I for instance fail to see a swift resolution of the Ukrainian conflict. Second, inflation expectations could become de-anchored, should high inflation persist. Although there is no clear evidence of a wage-price spiral yet, wages are creeping up on the back of an increasingly tight labor market. Third, while in the euro area exchange rate pass-through to inflation is far from complete, a depreciating euro/dollar rate can have significant effects on headline inflation, particularly in a context of very high commodity prices.
And the fourth risk relates to fiscal policy. Recent budgetary decisions suggest that fiscal support will continue to be substantial, even though the euro area economy has been growing strongly and labor markets have remained extremely tight. Some countries recently announced an extension of 2022 fiscal packages and/or additional support measures for 2023. While such policies can buffer the impact of negative supply shocks for instance on our citizens’ purchasing power, they sustain upside risk to inflation.
On policy I would like to emphasize that the broadening and deepening of our inflation problem generates the need to act forcefully.
A swift normalization of interest rates is an essential first phase, and some front-loading should not be excluded. There is, however, inherent uncertainty surrounding the neutral rate as well as on the question whether going to neutral will be sufficient to bring inflation back to target. This implies that the path and end point for the policy rate remain uncertain. It would probably serve us well to simply continue raising our policy rates until the inflation outlook becomes consistent again with our symmetric 2% target over the medium-term. As model outcomes inherently lack robustness in the aftermath of such unprecedented shocks, we need to give more weight to actual underlying inflation dynamics in our monetary policy decisions. That also implies that we will continue to take our decisions on a meeting-by-meeting basis.
Beyond policy rate increases, the relatively flat yield curve shows that the size of the central bank’s balance sheet is and should become an important element of the normalization process as well, and I expect the issue of APP-reinvestments to feature more prominently in our discussions at a later point in the year.
Thank you.